<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 reasons why nano reef aquariums are cool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool</link>
	<description>the small side of reef aquariums</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:39:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Man and Van Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Man and Van Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-541</guid>
		<description>I really like the 5th reason. I think it is the coolest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the 5th reason. I think it is the coolest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reef Galaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Reef Galaxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-538</guid>
		<description>I think point no.3 is most pertinent.

Watching the detail in 5-polyp&#039;ed zoanthid trying to outgrow it&#039;s neighbour or viewing a trochus snail slowly munch its way through 10 inches of algae on a front panel is mint.

Its no trip to the monterey bay aquarium, but its better value for money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think point no.3 is most pertinent.</p>
<p>Watching the detail in 5-polyp&#8217;ed zoanthid trying to outgrow it&#8217;s neighbour or viewing a trochus snail slowly munch its way through 10 inches of algae on a front panel is mint.</p>
<p>Its no trip to the monterey bay aquarium, but its better value for money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -A.</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>-A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-393</guid>
		<description>@derek-a)hehe and b)small tanks do have wow factor! the very fact that we can keep these microscopic pieces of the ocean on desks or nightstands alone is &#039;wow&#039;.[and i&#039;m basically teasing here....don&#039;t shoot, lol!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@derek-a)hehe and b)small tanks do have wow factor! the very fact that we can keep these microscopic pieces of the ocean on desks or nightstands alone is &#8216;wow&#8217;.[and i'm basically teasing here....don't shoot, lol!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phat</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>phat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-377</guid>
		<description>classic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>classic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five ways Nano Reefs are changing the way we do reef tanks</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Five ways Nano Reefs are changing the way we do reef tanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-305</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;5 reasons nano reefs are cool&#8221; on Nano Reef Blog (site is currently down back up) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;5 reasons nano reefs are cool&#8221; on Nano Reef Blog (site is currently down back up) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curvball</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Curvball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-300</guid>
		<description>@Derek, I really loved your response.
@stonyreef - thanks for sharing in insight, think it&#039;s interesting that you are one  the few reefers who go down in size rather than going up.

Also, the guys over at ReefBuilders.com put together their own take on this post, check it out here: http://reefbuilders.com/2010/02/16/reasons-nano-reefs-changing-reef-tanks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Derek, I really loved your response.<br />
@stonyreef &#8211; thanks for sharing in insight, think it&#8217;s interesting that you are one  the few reefers who go down in size rather than going up.</p>
<p>Also, the guys over at ReefBuilders.com put together their own take on this post, check it out here: <a  href="http://reefbuilders.com/2010/02/16/reasons-nano-reefs-changing-reef-tanks/" rel="nofollow">http://reefbuilders.com/2010/02/16/reasons-nano-reefs-changing-reef-tanks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stonyreef</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>stonyreef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-299</guid>
		<description>#2, space, has always been the deciding factor for me. I started years ago with a 220 and have progressively gone down in size to my current 20 gallon. Not only does space as a physical factor play a role, but space as an aesthetic quality definitely comes in to play. The beauty of a nano reef is that it doesn&#039;t need to be the centerpiece of a room, but can be slipped in to complement the surrounding area as well. 

As to #5, now that I have only a 20 gallon w/ small sump, as opposed to a 25 gallon with 3 extra tanks plumbed inline, I find myself doing water changes bi-weekly, just a gallon at a time. We&#039;ll see if this sticks now that it&#039;s finished cycling, but it&#039;s considerably easier than having to have 50 gallons of salt mixed up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, space, has always been the deciding factor for me. I started years ago with a 220 and have progressively gone down in size to my current 20 gallon. Not only does space as a physical factor play a role, but space as an aesthetic quality definitely comes in to play. The beauty of a nano reef is that it doesn&#8217;t need to be the centerpiece of a room, but can be slipped in to complement the surrounding area as well. </p>
<p>As to #5, now that I have only a 20 gallon w/ small sump, as opposed to a 25 gallon with 3 extra tanks plumbed inline, I find myself doing water changes bi-weekly, just a gallon at a time. We&#8217;ll see if this sticks now that it&#8217;s finished cycling, but it&#8217;s considerably easier than having to have 50 gallons of salt mixed up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek (rodstar)</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek (rodstar)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Great post and 100% true!  But, I offer a half-serious, half tongue-in-cheek rebuttal here:  http://bit.ly/9kUCxO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post and 100% true!  But, I offer a half-serious, half tongue-in-cheek rebuttal here:  <a  href="http://bit.ly/9kUCxO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9kUCxO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 reasons Nano Reefs are NOT cool: A response to NanoReefBlog&#160;&#124;&#160;Obsessive Compulsive Reef Disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.nanoreefblog.com/features/good-bad/5-reasons-why-nano-reef-aquariums-are-cool/comment-page-1#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>5 reasons Nano Reefs are NOT cool: A response to NanoReefBlog&#160;&#124;&#160;Obsessive Compulsive Reef Disorder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanoreefblog.com/?p=831#comment-296</guid>
		<description>[...] NanoReefBlog posted a entry &#8220;5 reasons why nano reefs are cool&#8220;.  And, while he is absolutely correct, here is my response, &#8220;5 Reasons why Nano Reefs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NanoReefBlog posted a entry &#8220;5 reasons why nano reefs are cool&#8220;.  And, while he is absolutely correct, here is my response, &#8220;5 Reasons why Nano Reefs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
